<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update letter received from DSE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fbanavic.org/2006/09/28/update-letter-received-from-dse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fbanavic.org/2006/09/28/update-letter-received-from-dse/</link>
	<description>Clothing free, on a free beach!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bendigonudey</title>
		<link>http://www.fbanavic.org/2006/09/28/update-letter-received-from-dse/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>bendigonudey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fbanavic.org/2006/09/28/update-letter-received-from-dse/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Someone has suggested Kangaroo Ground, on the upper reaches of the Yarra.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone has suggested Kangaroo Ground, on the upper reaches of the Yarra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bendigonudey</title>
		<link>http://www.fbanavic.org/2006/09/28/update-letter-received-from-dse/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>bendigonudey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fbanavic.org/2006/09/28/update-letter-received-from-dse/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Just when were starting to get some positive noises again, the whole thing takes off downhill with us again having to scramble to keep up!

Perhaps if they want to review the beaches, they should do a proper review.

Let's take the challenge up to them!

First: If you haven't done so already, please write to Hulls before Monday - contact details are available from the main page.

Second: Send us details of other "unofficial" beaches that we think should legitimately be Clothing optional - either through a message on here or through the website email, and I / We will ask for them to be taken into consideration in any review.

For a start there is one down at Somers that I am vaguely aware of, one in Gippsland that had an oficially approved "trial day" last year, and a couple down near Portland / Warrnambool that are mentioned in "Bare Facts".

Any details people can send of these would be appreciated.

But lets ask for others:
The beach at "Sandgate" (Port Melb area) had a bad reputation for offensive behaviour - why don't we ask them to clean it up and make it clothing optional - under the Act, the Minister can declare it so between dawn and dusk, which should keep it legit if it attracts enough crowds.

Any others that we want?

I doubt that we would get St Kilda or Elwood, but perhaps we should ask for a section near Kerfed Road, where topless and G-strings were pioneered on Melbourne beaches.

What about inland? A part of Lake Eppalock would be good (and very handy for me), but its "normal" 160 km shoreline is down to about 5 km, so not much prospect unless we get rain of Biblical proportions!

Looking forward to hearing from you!

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when were starting to get some positive noises again, the whole thing takes off downhill with us again having to scramble to keep up!</p>
<p>Perhaps if they want to review the beaches, they should do a proper review.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take the challenge up to them!</p>
<p>First: If you haven&#8217;t done so already, please write to Hulls before Monday - contact details are available from the main page.</p>
<p>Second: Send us details of other &#8220;unofficial&#8221; beaches that we think should legitimately be Clothing optional - either through a message on here or through the website email, and I / We will ask for them to be taken into consideration in any review.</p>
<p>For a start there is one down at Somers that I am vaguely aware of, one in Gippsland that had an oficially approved &#8220;trial day&#8221; last year, and a couple down near Portland / Warrnambool that are mentioned in &#8220;Bare Facts&#8221;.</p>
<p>Any details people can send of these would be appreciated.</p>
<p>But lets ask for others:<br />
The beach at &#8220;Sandgate&#8221; (Port Melb area) had a bad reputation for offensive behaviour - why don&#8217;t we ask them to clean it up and make it clothing optional - under the Act, the Minister can declare it so between dawn and dusk, which should keep it legit if it attracts enough crowds.</p>
<p>Any others that we want?</p>
<p>I doubt that we would get St Kilda or Elwood, but perhaps we should ask for a section near Kerfed Road, where topless and G-strings were pioneered on Melbourne beaches.</p>
<p>What about inland? A part of Lake Eppalock would be good (and very handy for me), but its &#8220;normal&#8221; 160 km shoreline is down to about 5 km, so not much prospect unless we get rain of Biblical proportions!</p>
<p>Looking forward to hearing from you!</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
